Military Rule

Many third world countries sustain been below armed services eclipse from time to time, for bity years. The reasons rear end this are many, and are complicated and interconnected. A armed forces pridefulism conveys established when political power rests with the army. Developing countries are so called because they are still in the work on of development. These areas of development include economy, financial planning and budgeting, setting up of a functional administrative machinery, a working constitution, a functional governance of government, a system of institutions of education, a system of health, so on and so forth.Altogether, developing countries lack a lot of basic tools needed for right functioning of a solid ground. civils in general are disillusioned with life. There is widespread poverty and illiteracy. Flaws in the working of the system ultimately result in major problems for the common man. Neither is the health system strong, nor the education. The gov ernment commonly does not provide for even the basic needs. People generally bewilder epic families, with no timed source of income. Since literacy is low, most concourse have confounded and obscure views, and do not understand the working of the system.People get frustrated, and blame the government for not providing for them. As public support begins to crumble, the administration gets weakened. In developing countries, politics is frequently a monopoly, handled by the rich few. Laws and rules can be bended and kinky as desired. And so this feudal system of government results in economic and social collapse. Crime rank go on increasing, a vast with a host of other illegal activities. In the absence seizure proper jobs, ordinary people turn to illicit ways of obtaining money.These are just some of the main problems. In case of a threat from another country, or a natural disaster, or food shortage, matters get worse. Often governments succumb to ill advised measures. And so g oes on the cycle. armed services rule comes in the absence of a strong government. There are many inter-related factors stooge the prevalence of military rule, especially in third world countries. A weak civilian government can be disbanded easily, without much force. historical examples of military rule include the Greek Sparta 7The ideology behind military rule is one ground on discipline the one thing a developing country lacks. Militarism is generally the belief of the reactionary 7. Under military rule, everything is under strict control of the army, and civilians are subservient to it, whether they like it or not. Civilian rule on the contrary advocates complete freedom, along with organized plans for social and economic development and organic law of diplomatic relations with other countries 7.Militarism can also mean Martial Law 7. When a average judicial system is replaced by military rule, it is called martial law 7. It is used mostly by authoritarian governments 7. Earlier, it was imposed in times of war, or territorial occupation, to deal with trials of prisoners and soldiers 7. It was also used by those countries with expansionist and imperialist policies 7. Today, in developing countries, it is the easiest tool to bring a distraught and a disorganized conjunction under control. Martial law trials are short, and usually severe when compared to normal court trials 7.Many counties have now shifted to another system, in which a country is said to be in a assign of emergency, in place of martial law 7. Martial law also gives the government the liberty of detaining anyone it thinks is a threat to national interest or security, even without adequate proof. Media and press freedom is also under strict control. The few leading the hegemony can make decisions without hindrance, keeping the public and its opinions at bay.Under military rule, a countrys population has no say in any matter whatsoever. Without a parliament, all decisions are directly made by the autocrat and his collaborators, without the approval or disapproval of ministers. conceptualise a little deeper, and it seems as if a country comes to an economic and social standstill if under military rule. This is exactly what most developing countries go through. One coup after another and the country lags behind even in the basic amenities of life.Egypt, for example, has been under martial law on and off from 1952 7. Gamal Abdel Nasser was the electric chair of Egypt from 1956 until his death, in 1970 7. Algeria spent three decades under military rule (1965-1994) 7. Mohammad Al-Gaddafi has been the de facto head of Libya since 1969. Nigeria has also been caught up in a tangle of coups. Adebowale, in his work criticizes the way military coups took to power, squandering money on abounding cars and houses, and turning into multi-billionaires overnight 10.He also goes on to say that Nigerians are mute because they are terror-stricken and know no other state 10. He al so states that Several human rights activists continue to be unjustly detained 10. Countries like Somalia, Sudan, Liberia, Philippines, Thailand, Ghana, Ethiopia, Bangladesh, Indonesia and Gambia have also been under military control often. Maureen Aung-Thwin criticized the undemocratic manner in which politics was run in Burma 9. Uganda spent a decade under the rule of one man Idi Amin 1. As opposed to this, almost no first world country has been under military rule since almost 20 years.Military governments also justify themselves by claiming that it is important for political stability 7. Military regimes tend to portray themselves as neutral and unbiased 7. Though not always, military rule tends to have little respect for human rights, and often use force to silence their political opponents 7.Another reveal factor is the convenience of having a military leadership, as opposed to the effort required for an elected one. domain choice can be satisfactoryly ignored and new laws can be easily imposed. The general public is weak, with little or no voice of its own. With widespread illiteracy, public opinion can be suppressed, bribed, or even forced. The general public in developed countries, on the contrary is much stronger and awake(predicate) of their due rights.Hunger for power and money make the entire system corrupt and fraudulent, with innumerable loopholes. With an authoritative background, anyone can come to power. High posts like those of governors and chief ministers are based on favoritism quite an than open merit. Countries currently under military rule include Thailand, Myanmar, Egypt, Libya, Pakistan and Fiji 7.If loosely stated, the three key factors behind prevalence of military rule in developing countries are the hunger for power and money, a large but weak civilian population, and convenience for the army. With just one man to make decisions, it gets very convenient for military personnel to run the country.In the end, it is the normal civilian population which suffers. In hopes of better prospects, people look forward to young and dynamic leaders, but in reality, the nation continues to live under a rigid and a totalitarian leadership. It is a widely believed notion that civilian rule is always better, long lasting, and makes a country prosperous. With free and fair democratic elections, the people themselves choose their leader, and so, everything falls in place, and the country can look forward to a brighter future.Works CitedPrince Adebowale, Samuel Abiodun, Nigeria The Nation under Siege by advocate Drunk and Ruthless Military Dictatorship, 1997 Aung-Thwin, Maureen, Burma Political Economy Under Military Rule, (edited by Robert H. Taylor), 2001, New York Palgrave (Global create at St. Martins Press), ISBN 0-312-23568-2. Birkhimer, William E, Military Government and Martial Law (third edition, revised), 1914, Kansas City Missouri, Franklin Hudson Publishing Co. Chris, Alli M. The Federal Republic of Nigeria n Army The Siege of a Nation, 2002, Nigeria Malthouse, 9780231277 Fidel, Kenneth, 1975, Militarism in developing countries, Transaction Publishers ISBN 0878555854 Fink, Christina, Living Silence Burma under military rule (politics in contemporary Asia), 2001, Zed Books Ltd. Libya History, (2006, July 14), US Department of States Background Notes, (Nov. 2005). Militarism, wikipedia, retrieved from http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militarism Olukotun, Ayo, Repressive State and revived Media under Nigerias Military Dictatorship, 1988-98, Nordic Africa Institute, (2004)